Violence around the world has been popping up a lot lately.
Estimates put the
death toll in Syria over 100,000 that makes it the most deadly global conflict
at the moment; as deadly in the past 4 years as Iraqi violence in the last 10
years. Negotiations around the civil war in Syria seem to be going nowhere. Some
accounts suggest that the negotiations were never more than a charade by the
Assad government in the first place.
Iraqi violence had a significant increase in 2013 with
around 10,000 known casualties. Although the end of 2013 and the beginning of
2014 show some signs of decline in violence Iraq’s irregular periodic up ticks
and down swings makes it hard to predict.
Violence in the
streets in Ukraine has led to the toppling of the government and as I write
this the Ukrainian president and sections of parliamentary are resigning in
mass. There is uncertainty about what is next.
Venezuela is
experiencing violence in street demonstrations started by an extreme right wing
and responded to by pro-government groups. It is unlikely that this situation
will evolve into a situation like the Ukraine much less the civil war in Syria
but one never knows.
Africa has 15 countries involved in wars or post war
conflicts.
American drones recently hit a wedding party in Yemen
killing 12 people. American drones terrorizing the northeastern Pakistani
tribal regions controlled by Taliban has led to Taliban leaders refusing to
allow immunization programs to continue in one of the last places on earth
still plagued by polio. Between the drones and the refusal to permit immunization
this should be considered biological warfare.
This week the UN commission
of inquiry on human rights in the DPRK reported their finding of crimes against
humanity in North Korea spelling out the violence that the North Korean
government has been inflicting on their own population.
In spite of this outline of political violence in the world
there are some small hopeful signs. However weekly symbolic North Korea
recently allowed a small group of North Koreans to meet with their long separated
South Korean relatives. Negotiations around Iranian nuclear development between
Iran and the US lead “West” continue to move at pace. On Valentine ’s Day
countries of the non-aligned movement called for a target date to be set for
the elimination of nuclear weapons. On that same day women around the world
participated in a day of mass action called 1 billion women rising which is a
protest of violence against women.
But let’s return to the various conflicts around the world.
Among these conflicts there is imperial attacks, civil wars , street fights, acts
of self-defense, violence propagated by
terrorist groups and bands of thugs (who is a thug or terrorist and what is self-defense
may depend on your political perspective). There are conflicts that drag on for
years and violence that may be over by the time you read this. Syria has a high
death count. I hope the number killed in
Venezuela will remain single digit.
The reasons for these violent conflicts are up for debate:
Economics, and the control of resources, religious beliefs, and religious feuds,
historical conflicts, political order, political liberty, national pride and
political alliances, ideology or class conflicts? Depending on the conflict any
one or several of these issues may be at the root.
From a distance I could condemn all of this violence as pointless,
and immoral. Fortunately I believe that more
and more people everywhere are growing critical of political violence. But I want to emphasize the uncertainty and ineffectualness
of political violence.
Let’s just look at the Ukraine, with push from Russia,
Ukraine’s president Yanukovych decided to crack down on the protesters, they
fought back and the crises of legitimacy grew too great so that just a few days
later Yanukovych and much of his government resigned and have fled. Now there is a political vacuum and the
forces that might fill it are sometimes opposing factions. If the country leans
too far to the west some observers say this could lead to drawn out military conflicts
with Russia.
The Syrian Civil war is a struggle for a country with at
least three different political tendencies, and regardless of who “wins” as the
country is torn apart everyone loses. The
longer the war goes on the harder it becomes to forgive and make peace.
Presumably the North Korean leadership even with Kim Jong
Un, the new supreme leader has still concluded that torture, abduction, public
killings, planned food withholding and prisoner work camps (all findings of the
UN commission) is a way to move forward in the world or perhaps it’s just their
desperate strategy for holding onto power.
Behind the violence in Venezuela some people see US puppeteers;
with US history in Latin America this wouldn’t be entirely surprising. Whatever
the final results of this violence, likely political fall-out from this street
violence will be further fuel for the anti-Chaves anti-Maduro propaganda machine.
Engagement in the violence from either the government or its supporters only
hurts its cause.
“Well meaning” American drones are (surprise) fueling anti-American
sentiments and helps to prop up the Taliban while increasing political instability
in Pakistan and Yemen.
It would be nice if I could claim that the non-violent “Orange Revolution” of Ukraine created a fully democratic government
that was responsive to the aspirations of its people even 10 years later.
I wish I could look to the results of the Arab Spring and
see clearly that its nonviolent campaigns produced the fruits that its
participants were trying to cultivate. While the case can be made for that kind
of success in Tunisia, Egypt has swung from nonviolent success, to electoral
counter revolution, to military counter revolution each swing seeming to take
the Egyptian people further from the society that the original revolution
sought.
Things would be easier if Venezuela hadn’t already
experienced at least one coup attempt since Hugo Chavez was first elected, if there
weren’t forces actively working to overturn Venezuela’s political efforts at
economic fairness.
Building a better world is often one step forward one step
back and repeat. Wishes don’t always come true, things aren’t always easy.
Maybe there are times when violence makes sense in moving
forward some important political program or goal. I don’t know how one knows when it’s one of
those times.
From my perspective, even with its uncertain results,
non-violence holds better promise. I
would much rather be in Egypt than Syria. The science of non-violence deserves deeper
research. Even just negotiations whether with a government, a terrorist group or
a political opposition hold more promises than turning to force. You might ask,
“how can you negotiate with them?” My response is “could talking really be
worse than coming in shooting?”
